Prince Harry will have to continue paying for his private security team when he visits the UK, after losing his court case against the Home Office over the removal of his automatic police protection.
On Tuesday, it was revealed the prince’s failed legal bid has cost the taxpayer more than £500,000.
Last year, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex paid $2million (£1.58million) for their security arrangements.
Security consultant Simon Morgan, himself a former royal protection officer, said despite the duke’s defeat in the court – his arrangements would remain much the same.
Mr Morgan said: ‘If you look at Harry’s current situation, he has no police protection in the UK or the US and he’s currently paying for his own protection team. So actually, from his perspective, very little is going to change. He’s already made that shift over to the private sector.
Prince Harry’s (pictured last March outside the High Court) failed court case against the Home Office over the removal of his automatic police protection has cost the taxpayer more than £500,000
‘There’s been various visits to the UK where he has used his private security team. In actual fact, nothing really is going to change for him, he’s going to carry on what he has been doing.’
Despite this, there is evidence Harry has started to enjoy some of his old royal protection thanks to his father, according to Mr Morgan, who worked for members of the Royal Family between 2007 and 2013 in the UK and overseas and who now runs Mayfair-based private security company Trojan Consultancy
Mr Morgan added: ‘On his last visit to see his father, you can see he’s had some police protection. That was quite evident in relation to the vehicles he was travelling in.’
Officials spent £514,128 fighting two separate judicial review claims brought by the Duke of Sussex after his security status was downgraded when he and wife Meghan ceased being working royals and moved to the US.
The legal bill could still increase, as Harry has vowed to appeal against his latest defeat when a judge last month ruled he had failed to prove the decision was unfair or unlawful.
The costs of the two claims will raise questions over a member of the Royal Family launching legal action against the Government.
The legal bill included more than £180,000 for barristers, £320,000 for the Government’s legal department, which provides legal advice, and £3,200 in court fees, according to a Freedom of Information request by the Daily Telegraph.
Officials spent £514,128 fighting two separate judicial review claims brought by the Duke of Sussex after his security status was downgraded
Meghan Markle and Prince Harry at the Invictus Games in Dusseldorf on September 16, 2023
Almost £10,000 was spent on the disclosure of electronic documents linked to the case, believed to include emails between civil servants and the Royal Household.
Harry, 39, claimed the decision by the Home Office’s Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures, known as Ravec, was unfair and jeopardised the safety of him and his family.
His lawyers argued he was ‘singled out’ and treated less favourably than other VIPs.
The Home Office said Britain had ‘finite public resources’ and argued police protection should be limited to those ‘acting in the interest of the State through their public role’.
A High Court judge ruled the decision to revoke his round-the-clock taxpayer-funded police protection and instead review his security needs on a case-by-case basis was lawful, and dismissed his case.
Prince Harry and Meghan, pictured at an Invictus Games event in Canada on February 14, 2024
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle stand outside Kensington Palace after announcing their engagement in November 2017
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex attend an event in Whistler near Vancouver in the build up to the 2025 Invictus Games
William, Harry, Meghan and Charles speak together at a service at Westminster Abbey in March 2019 – the year before the Sussexes stepped down as senior royals and moved to the US
The ruling left Harry with an estimated £1million legal bill. He was previously barred from bringing a separate claim over his request to pay for his own protection.
He is pursuing separate legal cases against News Group Newspapers, which publishes The Sun and the now-defunct News of the World, and Associated Newspapers, publisher of the Daily Mail.
In January, he abandoned a libel claim against the Mail’s sister paper The Mail on Sunday over an article about his security, leaving him facing an estimated £750,000 legal bill.
Weeks later he accepted ‘substantial’ damages to end a four-year legal case against Mirror Group Newspapers over phone hacking.
Read more
News Related-
Pedestrian in his 70s dies after being struck by a lorry in Co Laois
-
Vermont shooting updates: Burlington police reveal suspect’s eerie reaction to arrest
-
Grace Dent says her ‘heart is broken’ as she exits I’m A Celebrity early
-
Stromer’s ST3 Urban E-Bike Goes Fancy With Minimalist Design, Modern Tech
-
Under-pressure Justice Minister announces review of the use of force for gardaí
-
My appearance has changed because of ageing, says Jennifer Lawrence
-
Man allegedly stabbed in the head during row in Co Wexford direct provision centre
-
Children escape without injury after petrol bomb allegedly thrown at house in Cork City
-
Wexford gardai investigating assault as man is bitten in the face during Main Street altercation
-
Child minder’s husband handed eight year sentence for abusing two children
-
The full list of the best London restaurants, cafes and takeaways revealed at the Good Food Awards
-
Mazda CEO Says EVs 'Not Taking Off' In The U.S.—Except Teslas
-
Leitrim locals set up checkpoint to deter asylum seekers
-
Ask A Doctor: Can You Get Shingles More Than Once?