Donald Trump’s lawyer argued Thursday the former president can’t be prosecuted Georgia for trying to steal the 2020 election because his alleged conduct was political speech that must be protected under the First Amendment − even speech that was lies.
“Falsity alone is not enough,” Trump/s lawyer, Steven Sadow, said. “Clearly, being president at the time, dealing with elections and campaigning, calling into question what had occurred – that’s the height of political speech.”
Sadow urged Fulton County Superior Judge Scott McAfee to dismiss the charges against Trump because they are based on his statements questioning the election results and pressuring state officials to overturn them.
Start the day smarter. Get all the news you need in your inbox each morning.
“It’s the speech that’s being punished,” Sadow said. “Take out the political speech, no charges.”
McAfee didn’t rule immediately on the request. But he sounded skeptical that he could make any decision about whether the First Amendment protected Trump before holding the trial.
Attorney Steve Sadow, lawyer for former US President Donald Trump, speaks during final arguments in the District Attorney Fani Willis disqualification hearing at the Fulton County Courthouse on March 1, 2024, in Atlanta, Georgia. Fulton County Superior Judge Scott McAfee is considering a motion to disqualify Willis over her romantic relationship with Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade, whom she appointed as special prosecutor in the election interference charges against former Trump. (Photo by Alex Slitz / POOL / AFP) (Photo by ALEX SLITZ/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)
Prosecutors argued Trump’s statements contributed to a wide-ranging conspiracy of making false statements to government officials, submitting false and forged documents and impersonating public officials. Trump asked Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a fellow Republican, to “find” the votes he would need to carry the Peach State.
“It’s not just that he lied over and over and over again,” said prosecutor Donald Wakeford. “It’s that each of those was employed as part of criminal activity with criminal intentions.”
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan has already rejected Trump’s argument that his statements are protected by the First Amendment, in a federal case with similar charges of election interference. Wakeford directed McAfee to her reasoning for a detailed explanation for why Trump is wrong.
“It’s not a basis for dismissing the indictment,” Wakeford added.
Trump and 14 co-defendants have pleaded not guilty to election racketeering. Four defendants have pleaded guilty. McAfee hasn’t scheduled the trial yet but prosecutors have proposed starting in August.
The Lewis R. Slaton Courthouse is seen on Friday, March 15, 2024 in Atlanta, Georgia
Co-defendant Shafer argues Georgia had no legitimate presidential electors in 2020
Another defendant, David Shafer, who is chairman of the Georgia Republican Party, also sought to dismiss his charges Thursday. His lawyer, Craig Gillen, also asked to erase phrasing in the indictment describing Shafer as a “fake” presidential elector.
Shafer and two others are charged with impersonating public officials and forgery for meeting Dec. 14, 2020, and submitting paperwork as if they were Republican presidential electors for Trump. President Joe Biden narrowly won the state and Congress recognized his Democratic electors as legitimate.
Gillen argued that no electors – neither Republicans nor Democrats – should have been recognized because a Trump and Shafer lawsuit challenging the results was still pending Dec. 14, 2020.
“There were no duly elected and qualified presidential electors from the state of Georgia,” Gillen said.
Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp certified the election results and the electors, which Congress accepted.
Craig Gillen, attorney for David Shafer, speaks during a hearing in the 2020 Georgia election interference case at the Fulton County Courthouse on Dec. 1, 2023 in Atlanta, Georgia. Former President Trump and several co-defendants have all filed multiple motions to quash some or all the indictments against them.
Shafer, state GOP chair, objects to being called ‘fake elector’
Gillen also complained about prosecutors calling Shafer and others “fake electors” and argued the phrase should be removed from the indictment.
“It’s a pejorative statement,” Gillen said.
Will Wooten, another prosecutor, said the term “fake elector” doesn’t appear in the indictment, which does refer to as “unlawful” or “false Electoral College documents.”
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Donald Trump’s lawyer in Georgia: election lies are protected speech
News Related-
Russian court extends detention of Wall Street Journal reporter Gershkovich until end of January
-
Russian court extends detention of Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich, arrested on espionage charges
-
Israel's economy recovered from previous wars with Hamas, but this one might go longer, hit harder
-
Stock market today: Asian shares mixed ahead of US consumer confidence and price data
-
EXCLUSIVE: ‘Sister Wives' star Christine Brown says her kids' happy marriages inspired her leave Kody Brown
-
NBA fans roast Clippers for losing to Nuggets without Jokic, Murray, Gordon
-
Panthers-Senators brawl ends in 10-minute penalty for all players on ice
-
CNBC Daily Open: Is record Black Friday sales spike a false dawn?
-
Freed Israeli hostage describes deteriorating conditions while being held by Hamas
-
High stakes and glitz mark the vote in Paris for the 2030 World Expo host
-
Biden’s unworkable nursing rule will harm seniors
-
Jalen Hurts: We did what we needed to do when it mattered the most
-
LeBron James takes NBA all-time minutes lead in career-worst loss
-
Vikings' Kevin O'Connell to evaluate Josh Dobbs, path forward at QB