Micheal Martin says there are ‘legitimate’ concerns about hate speech bill

Tanaiste Micheal Martin (PA)

Micheal Martin has said “legitimate” concerns have been raised about what impact proposed hate speech legislation would have on freedom of speech.

Although the Tanaiste and Fianna Fail leader said that the constitution “covers” freedom of speech, he said that if Justice Minister Helen McEntee proposes amendments to the bill, it could be re-examined at committee level.

The Criminal Justice (Incitement to Violence or Hatred and Hate Offences) Bill 2022 passed through the Dail and is currently at committee stage.

Asked whether there was a possibility that the hate crime legislation could change, Mr Martin said that Ms McEntee has indicated she may propose amendments.

He added: “I think it’s fair to say there’s been significant debate on the issue, although a lot of deputies voted for this. The Sinn Fein party wanted it strengthened when it was going through the Dail, wanted others included in the legislation.

“Now the Sinn Fein party has done a 180 degree U-turn and wants the bill scrapped.”

He said: “TDs in the Dail voted for this legislation, so what I am saying is this: I think legitimate concerns have been raised in public debate around the freedom of speech aspect of it, although the constitution covers freedom of speech.

“There’s a number of options here, my view is if the minister is coming forward with amendments, then they could potentially be referred to the committee, and re-examine the legislation.

“And all of the political parties who were for it, now against it can come back in and give their views.

“There is a European dimension to this, my understanding is this is a transposition of an EU directive as well,” he said, and added: “I would like it to get some time at the justice committee if that’s possible.”

The Criminal Justice (Incitement to Violence or Hatred and Hate Offences) Bill 2022 is the first specific legislation that would deal with hate crime in Ireland, and would update existing hate speech laws.

It would repeal 1989 laws and replace them with legislation that would make it easier to secure convictions.

It would criminalise communication or behaviour that is likely to incite violence or hatred against a person because they belong to a protected characteristic.

There is also a provision to make hate an aggravating factor for existing offences when sentencing – although the bill has been criticised for not including a definition of what “hate” is.

Ms McEntee has cited a 29% increase in reported hate crimes in 2022, most of which were based on race, sexual orientation or nationality, as the basis for the bill.

The bill would also make it an offence to “condone, deny or grossly trivialise” genocide or war crimes.