What is this valuation gap in real estate in Japan and and how did it even get there in the first place? Yes, good morning. I hope it’s not too early to talk accounting, but this valuation gap in Japanese real estate essentially comes from the difference in book value and market value of properties held by Japanese companies essentially in an unrealized gangs. Now this gap has been around for a while, but it’s now being highlighted and kind of in the spotlight more because of these campaigns by active hedge funds at several Japanese companies that own real estate on their balance sheet. Now when Japanese companies own real estate on their balance sheet, they’re valued at Book Valley, which is essentially just the cost of acquiring or developing the property plus depreciation of. A fixed asset. Now what’s what’s quite unique in Japan is that many Japanese corporations have held on to their properties for decades. Thus, their value on the books is very low because of depreciation. In the meantime, property prices in Japan, especially Tokyo, have jumped in that same time period. Thus, if the companies were to sell these properties, they could realize billions in gains and by some estimates in aggregate, like the 100 thirty 43 billion figure you mentioned earlier. Lisa, how widespread is this real estate valuation gap for Japanese companies? Many Japanese companies hold real estate on their books and buy one analyst estimate there’s 700 listed companies in Japan that have real estate, and so it’s very, very widespread. Additionally, to give you an idea of kind of the scope of the gap some, if you’re looking at some very prime Tokyo skyscrapers, what their value for on the books of the owners is probably five times less than what it could fetch if it were sold on the market. So we know that there’s been a bit of pressure from from activists, investors, but but how they’re going about that? Yeah. So like I said earlier, the the property values and that kind of the unrealized gains of the value of the real estate can really only be seeing if the owners sell off the property. So several of these activist campaigns at the companies are actually basically asking them pressuring them to sell off the buildings to use the, the income and the capital from the sale to invest in kind of more value generating business lines or in more core businesses. Several kind of notable recent examples are Elliott. Which has a big stake in Mitsui Fudosan, and they’re, you know, arguing for some of the affordable to sell off some of its buildings and maybe reinvest that into kind of developing new properties. Another well noted case is Singaporean 3D Investment Partners, which has stakes in beer maker Sapporo and software maker Fuji Soft. In both those cases asking them to sell off a ton of real estate they hold and reinvest that into their core business.
News Related-
AWS and Clarity AI to use generative AI to boost sustainable investments
-
Ref Watch: 'Enough' of a foul to disallow Man City goal vs Liverpool
-
Day in the Life: Ex-England rugby star on organising this year's Emirates Dubai Sevens
-
Pandya returns to MI, Green goes to RCB
-
Snowstorm kills eight in Ukraine and Moldova, hundreds of towns lose power
-
‘This is why fewer Sikhs visiting gurdwaras abroad’: BJP after Indian envoy heckled in Long Island
-
Inside a Dubai home with upcycled furniture and zero waste
-
Captain Turner aims for Pitch 1 return as JESS bid to retain Dubai Sevens U19 crown
-
No Antoine Dupont but Dubai still set to launch new era for sevens
-
Why ESG investors are concerned about AI
-
Your campsite can harm the environment
-
Mubadala, Saudi Fund deals on US radar for potential China angle
-
Abu Dhabi T10 season seven to kick off with thrilling double-header
-
Eight climate fiction, or cli-fi, books to consider before Cop28