Hindu marriage not valid ‘unless performed with ceremonies in proper form’: SC

android, hindu marriage not valid ‘unless performed with ceremonies in proper form’: sc

Hindu marriage not valid ‘unless performed with ceremonies in proper form’: SC

A Hindu marriage is a ‘samskara’ or sacrament and cannot be recognised under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 “unless performed with ceremonies in the proper form”, the Supreme Court has ruled.

Underlining that a Hindu marriage “is a sacrament which has to be accorded its status as an institution of great value in Indian society”, a bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Augustine George Masih in an order dated April 19 urged “young men and women to think deeply about the institution of marriage even before they enter upon it and as to how sacred the said institution is, in Indian society”.

The top court reminded that “a (Hindu) marriage is not an event for ‘song and dance’ and ‘wining and dining’ or an occasion to demand and exchange dowry and gifts by undue pressure leading to possible initiation of criminal proceedings thereafter”.

The bench further said, “A marriage is not a commercial transaction. It is a solemn foundational event celebrated so as to establish a relationship between a man and a woman who acquire the status of a husband and wife for an evolving family in future which is a basic unit of Indian society. A Hindu marriage facilitates procreation, consolidates the unit of family and solidifies the spirit of fraternity within various communities. After all, a marriage is sacred for it provides a lifelong, dignity-affirming, equal, consensual and healthy union of two individuals. It is considered to be an event that confers salvation upon the individual especially when the rites and ceremonies are conducted.”

Delving into the provisions of the Hindu Marriage Act, the bench said that “unless and until the marriage is performed with appropriate ceremonies and in due form, it cannot be said to be ‘solemnised’ as per Section 7(1) of the Act”.

It pointed out that “further, sub-section (2) of Section 7 states that where such rites and ceremonies include the saptapadi, i.e., the taking of seven steps by the bridegroom and the bride jointly before the sacred fire, the marriage becomes complete and binding when the seventh step is taken. Therefore, requisite ceremonies for the solemnisation of the Hindu marriage must be in accordance with the applicable customs or usage and where saptapadi has been adopted, the marriage becomes complete and binding when the seventh step is taken”.

The court was dealing with a plea by a woman seeking the transfer of a divorce petition from a court in Muzaffarpur, Bihar to a court in Ranchi, Jharkhand. During the pendency of the petition, she and her former partner, both trained commercial pilots, decided to resolve the dispute by filing a joint application under Article 142 of the Constitution of India.

The couple were engaged to be married on March 7, 2021, and claimed to have ‘solemnized’ their marriage on July 7, 2021. They obtained a “marriage certificate” from Vadik Jankalyan Samiti and based on this certificate, secured a ‘Certificate of Registration of Marriage’ under the Uttar Pradesh Marriage Registration Rules, 2017. Their families fixed the date for the marriage ceremony as per Hindu rites and customs on October 25, 2022. Meanwhile, they lived separately but differences cropped up between them and cases followed.

The bench said that “where a Hindu marriage is not performed in accordance with the applicable rites or ceremonies such as saptapadi when included, the marriage will not be construed as a Hindu marriage. In other words, for a valid marriage under the Act, the requisite ceremonies have to be performed and there must be proof of performance of the said ceremony when an issue/controversy arises”.

“Unless the parties have undergone such ceremony, there would be no Hindu marriage according to Section 7 of the Act and a mere issuance of a certificate by an entity in the absence of the requisite ceremonies having been performed, would neither confirm any marital status to the parties nor establish a marriage under Hindu law,” the court said declaring as null and void the certificate issued by Vadik Jankalyan Samiti and the ‘marriage certificate’ issued under the Uttar Pradesh Registration Rules, 2017, as proof of “Hindu marriage”.

The bench said that if there has been no marriage in accordance with Section 7, the registration would not confer legitimacy to the marriage.

The court explained that “a Hindu marriage is a sacrament and has a sacred character. In the context of saptapadi in a Hindu marriage, according to Rig Veda, after completing the seventh step (saptapadi) the bridegroom says to his bride, “With seven steps we have become friends (sakha). May I attain to friendship with thee; may I not be separated from thy friendship”. A wife is considered to be half of oneself (ardhangini) but to be accepted with an identity of her own and to be a co-equal partner in the marriage. There is nothing like a “better-half” in a marriage but the spouses are equal halves in a marriage. In Hindu Law, as already noted, marriage is a sacrament or a samskara. It is the foundation for a new family”.

Such union provides them with the status and character of being a husband and wife in society, the bench said, and added that in this context, “We deprecate the practice of young men and women seeking to acquire the status of being a husband and a wife to each other and therefore purportedly being married, in the absence of a valid marriage ceremony under the provisions of the Act such as in the instant case where the marriage between the parties was to take place later”.

The court pointed out that any man and woman can acquire the status of husband and wife under the Special Marriage Act, 1954, which is not restricted to Hindus.

The bench said that “in recent years, we have come across several instances where for “practical purposes”, a man and a woman with the intention of solemnisation of their marriage at a future date seek to register their marriage under Section 8 of the Act on the basis of a document which may have been issued as proof of ‘solemnisation of their marriage’ such as in the instant case.”

It added, “We note that parents of young couples agree for registration of a marriage in order to apply for Visa for emigration to foreign countries where either of the parties may be working ‘in order to save time’ and pending formalising a marriage ceremony. Such practices have to be deprecated. What would be the consequence if no such marriage is solemnised at all at a future date? What would be the status of the parties then? Are they husband and wife in law and do they acquire such status in society?”

The Supreme Court said that “the customary ceremonies, with all its attendant geographical and cultural variations is said to purify and transform the spiritual being of an individual” and the 1955 Act “solemnly acknowledges both the material and spiritual aspects of this event in the married couple’s lives”.

The order said that “besides providing a mechanism for registration of marriages in order to confer the status of a married couple and acknowledge rights in personam and rights in rem, a special place is given to rites and ceremonies in the Act. It follows that the critical conditions for the solemnising of a Hindu marriage should be assiduously, strictly and religiously followed. This is for the reason that the genesis of a sacred process cannot be a trivial affair. The sincere conduct of and participation in the customary rites and ceremonies under Section 7 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 ought to be ensured by all married couples and priests who preside over the ceremony”.

The bench said that “the promises made to each by the parties to a Hindu marriage and the oath taken by them to remain friends forever lay the foundation for a life-long commitment between the spouses which should be realized by them. If such commitment to each other is adhered to by the couple, then there would be far fewer cases of breakdown of marriages leading to divorce or separation”.

For the latest news from across India, Political updates, Explainers, Sports News, Opinion, Entertainment Updates and more Top News, visit Indian Express. Subscribe to our award-winning Newsletter Download our App here Android & iOS

OTHER NEWS

12 minutes ago

Nvidia Blackwell 'Superchips' Will Cost Around $70,000 Each: Analyst

12 minutes ago

Three Penguins players undergo surgeries

12 minutes ago

FTX Creditors Want Crypto Back

12 minutes ago

Favorites stage 11 Giro d'Italia 2024 | Sea Battle at WorldTour level!

12 minutes ago

Sinner can become No. 1 even if he misses the French Open. He's already at the top for his behavior

12 minutes ago

Junior doctors and Government enter ‘mediated talks’ in bid to end pay dispute

12 minutes ago

Man Utd, Everton competing to sign ‘great’ centre-back as contract twist drives up price tag

12 minutes ago

New York Community Bancorp stock slides after $5B mortgage sale agreement

12 minutes ago

Fines for lockdown breaches less than for littering, ex-officer tells inquiry

12 minutes ago

Latest NFL schedule leaks and rumors, plus international games unveiled and one schedule wish for each team

12 minutes ago

World leading wind turbine centre to be built in North East as study highlights opportunities in green economy

12 minutes ago

'Only shows their desperation...': Annamalai hits back at Congress leader over Karkare claim

12 minutes ago

Intel 'Sunsets' Its Massive Ponte Vecchio Data Center GPU

12 minutes ago

PGA of America boss calls for urgency in PGA-PIF deal

12 minutes ago

College football way-too-early Top 25 after spring has SEC flavor with Georgia at No. 1

13 minutes ago

Chris Hemsworth gets emotional during 6-minute standing ovation for Furiosa at Cannes

13 minutes ago

Kevin Costner speaks out on 'Yellowstone' drama: 'All I did was protect myself'

16 minutes ago

Sexual assault survivors blast Ontario government for delays in passing key bill

18 minutes ago

Video: Incredible moment neighbors save a two-year-old girl's life by performing CPR on her on the bank of a pond after she fell in and nearly drowned

18 minutes ago

Inside the Red Lobster clearance auctions and the 48 shuttered restaurants that look like the Mary Celeste

18 minutes ago

OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever QUITS startup just months after sensationally kicking CEO Sam Altman out - then rehiring him

18 minutes ago

EC summons Andhra Chief Secretary and DGP over post-poll violence

18 minutes ago

Maroons icons pushing for forgotten star's recall

18 minutes ago

Netflix to stream NFL games on Christmas in 3-year deal, placing big bet on live sports

18 minutes ago

Gym owner who bought mobile top-up for Kinahan gang jailed for two years

18 minutes ago

Mortgage rates will 'lead the way' lower ahead of Fed rate cut, says Matt Graham

18 minutes ago

Wildfire service warns winds may fan 'aggressive' blazes in B.C.'s north

18 minutes ago

This, too, could pass: Christian group's rule keeping beaches closed on Sunday mornings may end

18 minutes ago

Newcastle keen on signing three players from same club in huge summer raid

18 minutes ago

Top 10 Sleeper Running Backs to Target in 2024 Fantasy Football Drafts

18 minutes ago

Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway reveals insurer Chubb as confidential stock it’s been buying

19 minutes ago

Rory McIlroy in flying form as he returns to happy hunting ground

19 minutes ago

Rory McIlroy gives four-word response to divorce question during PGA Championship press conference

19 minutes ago

All Luas services back in operation after power outage stopped trams during rush hour

19 minutes ago

STV industrial dispute ends with staff accepting improved pay offer

19 minutes ago

Steelers Full 2024 NFL Schedule Reveal: Weeks And Opponents Leaked

19 minutes ago

As Putin visits Xi, one is clearly stronger than the other

19 minutes ago

Olympic boxer Kellie Harrington 'craving normal life' and tells of grief over death of beloved dog

19 minutes ago

Ford boss hits back at concerning engine programme claims with Red Bull partnership

19 minutes ago

Starmer meets Labour MP given cold shoulder over gender views