Steven Miles said “all of the appropriate agencies are very focused on keeping Queenslanders safe from what could be an asbestos contamination in mulch.” Photograph: Dan Himbrechts/AAP
The Queensland premier says up to 25 businesses in the state’s south east have been provided with mulch that could have been contaminated with asbestos.
The dangerous material was found at waste facility, NuGrow, on 20 February in a proactive investigation by the government after asbestos was discovered at more than 60 sites across New South Wales in what has become an ongoing crisis in that state.
The premier, Steven Miles, said: “all of the appropriate agencies are very focused on keeping Queenslanders safe from what could be an asbestos contamination in mulch.”
Miles said NuGrow provided a list of about 25 businesses on Wednesday that had been supplied mulch.
“All of the agencies … are contacting those businesses to identify where the mulch could be and to organise for it to be tested,” he said.
Miles said he would make the list public as soon as possible and would be setting up a hotline for those concerned they may have been exposed to the mulch to get advice directly from experts.
The site, owned by NuGrow, was one of 23 landfill operations, transfer stations, landscape suppliers, composters and mulch suppliers tested across south-east Queensland by the department of environment and the asbestos safety unit of Workplace Health and Safety Queensland (WHSQ).
It has been the only positive result, with the department still awaiting results for half of the sites inspected.
Asbestos is prohibited from being accepted under NuGrow’s Environmental Authority. It is not clear where the asbestos came from.
The department has expanded its inspection program to include some additional sites outside south-east Queensland.
The department planned to test air quality in the area and has been working with West Moreton Public Health Unit and WHSQ to assess the risk, if any, to workers or the general public.
“We will immediately inform the community if any health risks are identified,” a spokesperson said.
NuGrow has been issued with a precautionary emergency direction to immediately take action to prevent the release of asbestos in the air.
The company must also provide information about where the material has been moved off site within the past 30 days and how it may have ended up in the facility.
“Out of an abundance of caution, action has been taken to impose requirements on NuGrow to protect health, safety, and the environment,” the department said.
“This includes WHSQ prohibiting NuGrow from disturbing the contaminated stockpile, and [the department of environment, science and innovation] ordering NuGrow to take all reasonable and practical measures to prevent asbestos from being released into the air.
“Asbestos presents a very low risk when undisturbed, and when preventive measures, such as those being imposed, are taken to prevent its release.”
In a statement, NuGrow said the asbestos was detected in a soil sample and was bonded, which is a less dangerous form of the material than friable asbestos.
Two fibres of bonded asbestos were found in one of four samples collected from the Ipswich facility.
A NuGrow spokesperson said no airborne particles of asbestos were detected.
“The level of asbestos concentration found in the positive sample is extremely low, equivalent to what might be detected in a sample of sand, mulch or soil taken from any beach, garden, park or other public space,” the spokesperson said.
“There is currently no evidence to suggest that people who may have come in contact with this material are at risk.”
The spokesperson said the company “follows industry best practice regarding testing of our product ranges prior to approval for sale”.
“A review of in-house qualitative assurance monitoring results from samples of finished product over the last several months shows no asbestos detected.”
WSHQ has issued a prohibition notice preventing the distribution of the contaminated materials.
Waste contaminated with asbestos is not allowed to be used in the manufacture of compost or mulch in Queensland.
An investigation by Guardian Australia revealed last month that the NSW environmental regulator had known for more than a decade that producers of soil fill were failing to comply with rules to limit the spread of asbestos into the community.
News Related-
High court unanimously ruled indefinite detention was unlawful while backing preventive regime
-
Cheika set for contract extension as another Wallabies head coaching candidate slips by
-
Analysis-West's de-risking starts to bite China's prospects
-
'Beyond a joke' Labor won't ensure PTSD protections: MP
-
Formula One season driver ratings: Lando Norris shines as Max Verstappen nears perfection
-
Catalina golfer Tony Riches scores Guinness World Record four holes in one on same hole
-
Florida coach Billy Napier fires assistants Sean Spencer, Corey Raymond with expected staff shakeup ahead
-
Rohingyan refugee NZYQ accidentally named in documents published by high court
-
Colorado loses commitments of 2 more high school recruits
-
Queensland Health issues urgent patient safety alert over national bacteria outbreak
-
Townsville Community Pantry 'distressed' by fruit, vegetable waste at Aldi supermarket
-
What Is The Beaver Moon And What Does It Mean For You?
-
Labor senator Pat Dodson to resign from politics due to health issues
-
Hamas releases 11 more hostages, as Israel agrees to extend ceasefire