Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) said any solutions besides codifying abortion rights would be insufficient to combat the near-total abortion ban from 1864 that may be implemented in Arizona.
“The damage is done,” Gallego, who’s running for the state’s U.S. Senate seat, told NBC News on Sunday. “Any initiative they pass right now wouldn’t even take effect for quite a while.”
The Arizona Supreme Court decided Tuesday that the 1864 abortion criminalization law could go into effect and sent it back to a lower court to hear arguments. The law would make abortion illegal except for pregnancies that threaten the life of the patient. It makes no exceptions for rape or incest.
The law is not currently in effect, but it would supersede the state’s 15-week abortion ban.
Gallego also explained why a repeal of the 1864 abortion ban wouldn’t work, saying, “To make matters worse, it could just get overturned later by another state House or state Senate.”
“The only protection we really, really have is to codify this and put this on the ballot and enshrine Roe and protect abortion rights,” he added.
After the Supreme Court’s decision Tuesday, Gallego referred to it as “devastating news for Arizona women, whose rights have been set back 160 years,” in a post on X, formerly Twitter.
“I will never stop fighting for Arizonans’ reproductive freedom and will do all I can to protect abortion rights,” Gallego wrote.
Gallego has been known to be a seemingly progressive politician, but he has recently started taking a more moderate tone to appeal to swing voters, according to The New York Times. He is set to battle against Kari Lake, the leading GOP candidate for Senate in Arizona, in November.
US Representative Ruben Gallego, Democrat of Arizona, holds a press conference outside of Silicon Valley Bank’s regional office addressing the vote by US Senator Kyrsten Sinema, Independent of Arizona, in favor of banking deregulation in Tempe, Arizona, on March 14, 2023. – With hindsight, there were warning signs ahead of last week’s spectacular collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, missed not only by investors, but by bank regulators. Just why the oversight failed remained a hot question among banking experts, with some focusing on the weakness of US rules. (Photo by Rebecca NOBLE / AFP) (Photo by REBECCA NOBLE/AFP via Getty Images) (Photo: REBECCA NOBLE via Getty Images)
Related…
News Related-
Russian court extends detention of Wall Street Journal reporter Gershkovich until end of January
-
Russian court extends detention of Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich, arrested on espionage charges
-
Israel's economy recovered from previous wars with Hamas, but this one might go longer, hit harder
-
Stock market today: Asian shares mixed ahead of US consumer confidence and price data
-
EXCLUSIVE: ‘Sister Wives' star Christine Brown says her kids' happy marriages inspired her leave Kody Brown
-
NBA fans roast Clippers for losing to Nuggets without Jokic, Murray, Gordon
-
Panthers-Senators brawl ends in 10-minute penalty for all players on ice
-
CNBC Daily Open: Is record Black Friday sales spike a false dawn?
-
Freed Israeli hostage describes deteriorating conditions while being held by Hamas
-
High stakes and glitz mark the vote in Paris for the 2030 World Expo host
-
Biden’s unworkable nursing rule will harm seniors
-
Jalen Hurts: We did what we needed to do when it mattered the most
-
LeBron James takes NBA all-time minutes lead in career-worst loss
-
Vikings' Kevin O'Connell to evaluate Josh Dobbs, path forward at QB